Cic edizioni internazionali
Muscle, Ligaments and Tendons Journal

Assessment of patient functional performance in different knee arthroplasty designs during unconstrained squat

Original Article, 514 - 523
doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.3.514
Tag this article
Abstract
Enhanced HTML Full text PDF
Background: In this paper, squat named by Authors unconstrained because performed without constrains related to feet position, speed, knee maximum angle to be reached, was tested as motor task revealing differences in functional performance after knee arthroplasty. It involves large joints ranges of motion, does not compromise joint safety and requires accurate control strategies to maintain balance.
Methods: Motion capture techniques were used to study squat on a healthy control group (CTR) and on three groups, each characterised by a specific knee arthroplasty design: a Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), a Mobile Bearing and a Fixed Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (respectively MBUA and FBUA). Squat was analysed during descent, maintenance and ascent phase and described by speed, angular kinematics of lower and upper body, the Center of Pressure (CoP) trajectory and muscle activation timing of quadriceps and biceps femoris.
Results: Compared to CTR, for TKA and MBUA knee maximum flexion was lower, vertical speed during descent and ascent reduced and the duration of whole movement was longer. CoP mean distance was higher for all arthroplasty groups during descent as higher was, CoP mean velocity for MBUA and TKA during ascent and descent.
Conclusions: Unconstrained squat is able to reveal differences in the functional performance among control and arthroplasty groups and between different arthroplasty designs. Considering the similarity index calculated for the variables showing statistically significance, FBUA performance appears to be closest to that of the CTR group.
Level of evidence: III a.

Vol. 7 (No. 4) 2017 October/December

  1. Arthroscopy and sport
    Volpi P.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.490
  2. Biomechanics: a fundamental tool with a long history (and even longer future!)
    Innocenti B.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.491
  3. Multibody modelling of ligamentous and bony stabilizers in the human elbow
    Terzini M., Zanetti E.M., Audenino A.L., Putame G., Gastaldi L., Pastorelli S., Panero E., Sard A., Bignardi C.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.493
  4. Biomechanical response of the plantar tissues of the foot in healthy and degenerative conditions
    Fontanella C.G., Carniel E.L., Macchi V., Porzionato A., De Caro R., Natali A.N.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.503
  5. Finite element comparison between the human and the ovine lumbar intervertebral disc
    Casaroli G., Villa T., Galbusera F.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.510
  6. Tibiofemoral wear in standard and non-standard squat: implication for total knee arthroplasty
    Fekete G., Sun D., Gu Y., Neis P.D., Ferreira N.F., Innocenti B., Csizmadia B.M.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.520
  7. Automatic characterization of soft tissues material properties during mechanical tests
    Innocenti B., Larrieu J.-C., Lambert P., Pianigiani S.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.529
  8. Full-field in vitro investigation of hard and soft tissue strain in the spine by means of Digital Image Correlation
    Ruspi M.L., Palanca M., Faldini C., Cristofolini L.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.538
  9. Sensitivity analysis of the material properties of different soft-tissues: implications for a subjectspecific knee arthroplasty
    Pianigiani S., Croce D., D'Aiuto M., Pascale W., Innocenti B.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.546
  10. Mechanoreceptors of the Achilles tendon: a histomorphological study in pigs with clinical significance for humans
    Kapetanakis S., Gkasdaris G., Daneva E., Givissis G., Papathanasiou J., Xanthos T.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.558
  11. Tripled semitendinosus with single harvesting is as effective but less invasive compared to standard gracilis-semitendinosus harvesting
    Drocco L., Camazzola D., Ferracini R., Lustig S., Ravera L., Graziano E., Massè A., Bistolfi A.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.564
  12. Differences between the sexes in athletes’ body composition and lower limb bioimpedance values
    Mascherini G., Castizo-Olier J., Irurtia A., Petri C., Galanti G.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.573
  13. Flexibility responses to different stretching methods in young elite basketball players
    Notarnicola A., Perroni F., Campese A., Maccagnano G., Monno A., Moretti B., Tafuri S.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.582
  14. The effect of deep shoulder infections on patient outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a retrospective comparative study
    Atesok K., MacDonald P., Leiter J., McRae S., Singh M., Stranges G., Old J.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.590
  15. Lower limb strength, but not sensorial integration, explains the age-associated postural control impairment
    Andrade H.B., Costa S.M., Pirôpo U.S., Schettino L., Casotti C.A., Pereira R.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.598
  16. Trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: a prospective trial on two widespread conservative therapies
    Rocchi L., Merolli A., Giordani L., Albensi C., Foti C.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.603
  17. Unicompartmental knee replacement in patients aged 70 years and older
    Ventura A., Legani C., Borgo E.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.611
Last Viewed articles: la lista degli ultimi x visitati.
  1. Assessment of patient functional performance in different knee arthroplasty designs during unconstrained squat
    Verdini F., Zara C., Leo T., Mengarelli A., Cardarelli S., Innocenti B.
    doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.3.514
credits